Water Management in Agriculture

Water Management in Agriculture

The effect of surface and subsurface drip irrigation in the presence of shallow saline water table on the two-dimensional distribution of soil moisture and salinity, morphological characteristics and maize yield

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Sima Abdoli 1
Ahmad farrokhian 2
Fariborz Abbasi 3
Abd Ali Naseri 4
1 Phd, Student, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Soil Science and Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 Professor Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
4 Professor, Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Faculty of Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Abstract
In the south of Iran, due to being located in the arid and semi-arid regions, the agricultural sector faces soil salinity resulting from the capillary rise of salt from the shallow saline water table to the soil surface and reducing crop yield. The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of surface drip irrigation (DI) and subsurface irrigation (SDI) methods on soil profile moisture and salinity distribution, maize (SC 703) yield, and irrigation water use efficiency in the presence of shallow saline water table (60 and 100 cm), during summer and spring seasons of 2021. A factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications in drained lysimeters filled with loamy soil (specific gravity 1.45 g cm-3) in field conditions. The results showed that the accumulation of salt above the dripper in subsurface irrigation method at both SDI100 and SDI60 treatments, was significantly more than the surface irrigation method (p<0.01). The results also revealed that summer maize yield was more than spring maize yield. Furthermore, in the summer season, irrigation in the root development zone in the SDI100 and SDI60 treatments caused an increase in the maize yield by 25 and 61%, respectively, and Water Productivity Index (WP) by 25 and 58%, respectively, in comparison to DI100 and DI60. Evaporation in SDI60 and SDI100 treatments was 26-30% and 43-51% lower than DI60 and DI100 treatments, respectively. The results of this research showed that SDI is more effective than DI in controlling soil profile salinity and plant yield.
Keywords
Arid and semi-arid regions
Maize (SC 703)
Salinity stress
Subsurface and surface drip irrigation
برزگری، م.،  آفرینش، ع.، اسلامی زاده، ر.، قنبری بیرگانی، د.، زاده دباغ، غ.، میرزاشاهی، ک.، سلیم پور، س. و خرمیان، م. 1386. نشریه ترویجی کاشت، داشت و برداشت ذرت در استان خوزستان. وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، سازمان جهاد کشاورزی خوزستان ترویج و نظام بهره‌برداری.
Abbas, G., Amjad, M., Saqib, M., Murtaza, B., Naeem, M. A., Shabbir, A. and Murtaza, G. 2020. Soil sodicity is more detrimental than salinity for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A multivariate comparison of physiological, biochemical and nutritional quality attributes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 207: 59–73.
Abdoli, S., Khalilimoghadam, B., Rahnama, M. and Soleimani, M. 2017 Comparison of different mass transport equations for wind erosion quantification purposes in southwest Iran: a wind tunnel study. Desert. 22:197–208
Abdoli, S., Farrokhian Firouzi, A., Abbasi, F. and Naseri, A. 2022. Heat moisture and salt transport in the soil profile under surface and subsurface drip irrigation methods in the presence of shallow saline groundwater. Arab J Geosci. 15: 1666- 2022
Alkhaier, F., Flerchinger, G.N. and Su, Z. 2012. Shallow groundwater effect on land surface temperature and surface energy balance under bare soil conditions: modeling and description. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. 16: 1817-1831.
Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Fao, Rome, 300(9), p.D05109.
Braud, I., Varado, N. and Olioso, A. 2005. Comparison of root water uptake modules using either the surface energy balance or potential transpiration. J. Hydrol. 301:267–286.
Chen, N., Li, X., Simunek, J., Shi, H., Hu, Q. and Zhang, Y. 2020. Evaluating soil nitrate dynamics in an intercropping dripped ecosystem using HYDRUS-2D. Science of the Total Environment 718: 137314.
Dagdelen, N., Basal, H., Yılmaz, E., Gürbüz, T. and Akcay, S. 2009. Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey. Agricultural Water Management. 96: 111–120.
El Maayar, M., Price, D.T. and Chen, J.M.  2009. Simulating daily, monthly and annual water balances in a land surface model using alternative root water uptake schemes. Adv. Water Resour. 32:1444–1459.
FAO, 2020. Mapping of salt-affected soils –Technical specifications and country guidelines. FAO.
Farre, I., van Oijen, M., Leffelaar, P. A. and Faci, J. M. 2000. Analysis of maize growth for different irrigation strategies in northeastern Spain. European Journal of Agronomy, 12: 225–238.
Grieve, C. M., Grattan, S. R. and Maas, E. V. 2012. Plant salt tolerance. In W. W. Wallender, & K. K. Tanji Eds.( ASCE manual and reports on engineering practice No. 71: Agricultural salinity assessment and management 2nd ed. pp: 405–459). ASCE.
Hanson, B. and May, D. 2004. Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity, and profitability. Agricultural Water Management. 68(1); 1–17.
Hanson, B., Hopmans, J. W. and Šimůnek, J. 2008. Leaching with subsurface drip irrigation under saline, shallow groundwater conditions. Vadose Zone Journal. 7(2): 810-818.
 
Hussain, T., Koyro, H. W., Zhang, W., Liu, X., Gul, B., Liu, X. 2020. Low salinity improves photosynthetic performance in Panicum antidotale under drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 481.
Hütsch, B. W., Jung, S., Schubert, S. 2015. Comparison of salt and drought-stress effects on maize growth and yield formation with regard to acid invertase activity in the kernels. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 201, 353–367.
Ibrahim, M. M., El-Baroudy, A. A., Taha, A. M., 2016. Irrigation and fertigation scheduling under drip irrigation for maize crop in sandy soil. International Agrophysics, 30(1), 47–55.
Karimi, G. H., Naseri, A. A., Behzad, M., Meskarbashi, M. 2011. Groundwater contribution with different salinities on providing maize water requirement and its effects on maize yields. Research on Crops, 12(3): 848-856.
Kollet, S., Maxwell, R. 2008. Capturing the influence of groundwater dynamics on land surface processes using an integrated, distributed watershed model. Water Resources Research 44.
Mengistu, A. G., van Rensburg, L. D., and Mavimbela, S. S. 2018. Shallow groundwater effects on evaporation and soil temperature in two windblown sands (Eutric Cambisol and Chromic Luvisol) in South Africa. Geoderma Regional 15: e00190.
Minhas, P. S., Bamos, T. B., Ben-Gal, A., Pereira, L. S. 2020. Coping with salinity in irrigated agriculture: Crop evapotranspiration and water management issues. Agricultural Water Management, 227, 105832.
Moll, R.H., Kamparth., E.J. 1977. Effect of population density up on agronomic traits associated with genetic increases in yield of Zea mays L. Agronomy journal, 69: 81-84.
Monaghan, J. M., Daccache, A., Vickers, L. H., Hess, T. M., Weatherhead, E. K., Grove, I. G., Knox J. W. 2013. ‘More crop per drop’: Constraints and opportunities for precision irrigation in European agriculture. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(5), 977–980.
Oikeh, S. O., Kling, J. G., Okoruwa, A. E.1988. Nitrogen fertilizer management effects on maize grain quality in the best African Moist Savanna. J. Crop Sci. 38:1056-1061.
Oron, G., DeMalach, Y., Gillerman, L., David, I., Rao, V. 1999. Improved saline-water use under subsurface drip irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 39: 19-33.
Oren, R., Philips, N., Ewers, B.E., Pataki, D.E. and Megonigal, J.P. 1999. Sap-flux scaled transpiration reponses to light, vapour pressure deficit, and leaf area reductionin a flooded Taxodium distichum forest. Tree Physiol. 19: 337–347.
Plaut, Z., Edelstein, M. and Ben-Hur, M. 2013. Overcoming salinity barriers to crop production using traditional methods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 32(4): 250-291.
Sampathkumar, T., Pandian, B. J. and Mahimairaja, S. 2012. Soil moisture distribution and root characters as influenced by deficit irrigation through drip system in cotton–maize cropping sequence. Agricultural water management. 103: 43-53.
Selim, T., Berndtsson, R. and Persson, M. 2013. Simulation of soil water and salinity distribution under surface drip irrigation. Irrigation and Drainage. 62: 352-362.
Setia, R. and Marschner, P. 2013. Impact of total water potential and varying contribution of matric and osmotic potential on carbon mineralization in saline soils. European Journal of Soil Biology. 56: 95–100.
Shahzad, M., Witzel K. Zörb, C. and Mühling, K. H. 2012. Growth-related changes in subcellular ion patterns in maize leaves (Zea mays L.) under salt stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 198: 46–56
Sheldon, A. R., Dalal, R. C., Kirchhof, G., Kopittke, P. M. and Menzies, N. W. 2017. The effect of salinity on plant-available water. Plant and Soil, 418(1–2): 477–491.
Skaggs, T., Trout, T., Šimunek, J. and Shouse, P. 2004. Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Eengineering. 130: 304-310.
Soylu, M. E., Loheide, S. P., Kucharik, C. J. 2017. Effects of root distribution and root water compensation on simulated water use in maize influenced by shallow groundwater. Vadose Zone Journal. 16(10): 1-15.
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E. and Rea, S. D. 2012. Crop yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 66. Rome Italy. FAO (2020). Mapping of salt-affected soils –Technical specifications and country guidelines. FAO.
Stone, P. J., Wilson, D. R., Reid, J. B. and Gillespie, G. N. 2001. Water deficit effects on sweet maize: I. Water use radiation use efficiency growth and yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 52: 103–113.
Teuling, A.J., Uijlenhoet, R., Hupet, F. and Troch P.A. 2006. Impact of plant water uptake strategy on soil moisture and evapotranspiration dynamics during drydown. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33:L03401.
Trout, TJ. and DeJonge, KC. 2018. Crop water use and crop coefficients of maize in the great plains. J Irrig Drain Eng. 144(6):04018009
Valentín, F., Nortes, P. A., Domínguez, A., Sánchez, J. M., Intrigliolo, D. S., Alarcón, J. J. and López-Urrea R. 2020. Comparing evapotranspiration and yield performance of maize under sprinkler superficial and subsurface drip irrigation in a semi-arid environment. Irrigation Science. 38(1): 105-115.
Van Genuchten, M. T. 1980. A closed‐form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 44: 892-898.
Whalley, W. R., Ober, E. S. and Jenkins, M. 2013. Measurement of the matric potential of soil water in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany. 64(13): 3951–3963.
Yadav, B.K. Mathur, S. and Siebel, M.A. 2009. Soil moisture dynamics modeling considering the root compensation mechanism for water uptake by plants. J. Hydrol. Eng. 14:913–922.